Legal Opinion
Zuckerman v. Pacific Savings Bank
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 17, 1986No. B015774PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LILLIE, P. J.
Plaintiffs appeal from summary judgment entered against them and in favor of defendants Pacific Savings Bank and Mar Vista Financial, Inc.
Facts
In 1980 plaintiff Zuckerman purchased improved real property and signed and delivered a promissory note for $199,600 and deed of trust to the property in favor of Santa Fe Federal Savings and Loan Association (subsequently known as Pacific Federal Savings and Loan Association and then Pacific Savings Bank, hereinafter Pacific). The promissory note required monthly payments of $2,523.83 plus late charges of $126.19 for payments more…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- AARTS Productions, Inc. v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Weathers v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Powell v. Standard Brands Paint Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Hayman v. BlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Taylor v. FieldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Reid v. Google, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2010
- Brantley v. PisaroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Saldana v. Globe-Weis Systems Co.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Biljac Associates v. First Interstate Bank of OregonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.