Legal Opinion
Town of Tortolita v. Napolitano
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided March 29, 2001No. 1-CA-CV 00-0437PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EHRLICH, Judge.
¶ 1 In a proceeding regarding the validity of the incorporation of the Town of Tortolita, the superior court entered a preliminary injunction prohibiting Tortolita and its officials from exercising governmental authority such as the assumption of obligations on behalf of Tortolita, including debt for attorneys’ fees. Nearly two years later, Tortolita requested modification of the preliminary injunction, seeking to dissolve the portion preventing it from incurring debt for attorneys’ fees. The court refused to grant a modification, and Tortolita appealed. For the reasons…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Trenton v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Williams v. Mayor of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- City of South Lake Tahoe, Roger Capri, as Mayor of the City of South Lake Tahoe v. California Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, and Gordon HooperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Federal Savings & Loan Insurance Corp. v. DixonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- City of Newark v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Trust v. County of YumaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- TP Racing, L.L.L.P. v. SimmsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- State Bar v. LangCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Tp Racing v. SimmsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016