Legal Opinion
City of Newark v. New Jersey
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 21, 1923No. 469PublishedCited by 99 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler
The State of New Jersey recovered judgment against the City of Newark for $18,104.08 and costs, in an action brought in the State Supreme Court. The judgment was affirmed by the Court of Errors and Appeals, and the case is here on writ of error. It is based on a state enactment which is attacked on the sole ground that it violates the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
The State’s right to recover depends upon the validity of an enactment of the State (c. 252, Laws of 1907) which is sufficiently set forth in the decision of this Court in Trenton v. New Jersey, handed down on…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Williams v. EgglestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Mason v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- State v. City of TrentonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
3Cited by99 opinions
- Williams v. Mayor of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- City of South Lake Tahoe, Roger Capri, as Mayor of the City of South Lake Tahoe v. California Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, and Gordon HooperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Richard M. Fogel, as Trustee for the Estate of Madison Management Group, Inc. v. Samuel Zell, Appeal of City and County of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Housing Authority of the Kaw Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma v. City of Ponca City, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Rivka Livnat v. Palestinian AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.