Legal Opinion
Kingray, Inc. v. National Basketball Ass'n
District Court, S.D. California
Decided February 1, 2002No. CIV. 00CV1545-LPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: (1) DIRECTV, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS; AND (2) NBA DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
LORENZ, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ motions to dismiss the First Amended Complaint. The Court finds these motions suitable for determination without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1).
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs, individuals and commercial establishments, have filed this lawsuit on behalf of commercial and residential purchasers of the “NBA League Pass,” the broadcast of a bundled package of NBA basketball games. (First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) ¶¶…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ninth Inning, Inc. v. Directv, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Philadelphia Eagles Football Club, Inc. v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Mediostream, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Sambreel Holdings LLC v. Facebook, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2012
- In Re Tableware Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.