Legal Opinion

State v. Marcum

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 17, 2003No. 20609-2-IIIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

This is a prosecution for possession of drugs and for unlawful possession of a firearm. The defendant, Jared Marcum, makes two assignments of error. First, he contends the judge’s conclusion that the police had reasonable suspicion to stop him is not supported either by the officer’s two earlier contacts with Mr. Marcum and the specific car he was in, or by the officer’s knowledge that Mr. Marcum’s license was suspended. We conclude that these facts support the investigative stop. Mr. Marcum next contends that the absence of an essential element of the crime of unlawful possession of a…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. United States v. CarllSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. State v. KjorsvikWashington Supreme Court · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. MarcumCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  4. State of Washington v. Jacob Daniel LevelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API