Legal Opinion
State v. Marcum
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 17, 2003No. 20609-2-IIIPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
66 P.3d 690 (2003)
116 Wash.App. 526
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Jared MARCUM, Appellant.
No. 20609-2-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Nine.
April 17, 2003.
James E. Egan, Kennewick, WA, for Appellant.
Andrew K. Miller, Prosecuting Attorney, Kennewick, WA, for Respondent.
SWEENEY, J.
This is a prosecution for possession of drugs and for unlawful possession of a firearm. The defendant, Jared Marcum, makes two assignments of error. First, he contends the judge's conclusion that the police had reasonable suspicion to stop him is not supported either by the officer's two…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- United States v. CarllSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- State v. KjorsvikWashington Supreme Court · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State of Washington v. Jacob Daniel LevelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021