Legal Opinion

Ingersoll v. Seatoft

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1899PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Winnebago county: G-eo. W. Buenell, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtCassoday, C. J.

It appears from the record, in effect, that the plaintiff commenced this action against the Ingersoll Land & Lumber ^Company, in April 1895, to recover a balance of account for services as general manager of the corporation ; that the corporation answered; that the case was twice continued at the request of the corporation; that an amended answer was filed on leave had, and a counterclaim made therein for rent, wrong, fraud, negligence, and malfeasance upon the plaintiff’s part, as the corporations officer, and judgment demanded for a large sum against the plaintiff; that plaintiff replied;…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Meyer v. BarthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Smith v. LockwoodWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Roberts v. WeadockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Shepard v. PebblesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Krall v. LibbeyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Priewe v. Wisconsin State Land & Improvement Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Grafton v. HinkleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Rodríguez v. SaldañaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1928
  4. Tackett v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. National Surety Co. v. ScalesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API