Rowan v. Southland Corp.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs appeal from the order of the trial court granting defendants’ motion for accelerated judgment of their complaint for failure to name the alleged intoxicated person as a defen dant, as required by the dramshop act, MCL 436.22; MSA 18.993.
Plaintiffs’ complaint alleged that defendants were owners of a party store at which one Wayne L. Bradford, a minor, purchased a twelve-pack of beer. Bradford became intoxicated as a result of consuming the beer, lost control of his automobile and struck an automobile driven by plaintiff Rose Rowan, causing her injury. The complaint alleged violation…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Salas v. ClementsMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Bement v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Forest v. ParmaleeMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Manuel v. WeitzmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
- Minty v. Board of State AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Tebo v. HavlikMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Millross v. Plum Hollow Golf ClubMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
- Dahn v. SheetsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Lucido v. Apollo Lanes and Bar, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Eddy v. Casey's General Store, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.