Legal Opinion

City of Gadsden v. Harbin

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 13, 2013No. 1120537PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WISE, Justice.

The City of Gadsden, the defendant below (“the City”), filed a permissive appeal pursuant to Rule 5, Ala. R.App. P., from a January 15, 2013, order of the Etowah Circuit Court denying the City’s motion for a summary judgment as to Roy Harbin’s breach-of-contract claim against the City. We reverse and remand.

Facts and Procedural History

Harbin started working as a police officer for the City in 1972. It is undisputed that he did not have a written employment contract with the City. In 1972, Harbin also started mandatory participation in the Policemen’s and Firemen’s Retirement…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Wilson v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. Berner v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. HodurskiSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Joe Taylor v. City of GadsdenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
  2. Amsted Rail Company Inc v. Bessemer, Alabama, City ofDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2020
  3. Brasher v. Allstate Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2020
  4. Douglas P. Byrne v. Vera FiskSupreme Court of Alabama · 2023
  5. Evans v. City of TalladegaDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API