City of Gadsden v. Harbin
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
WISE, Justice.
The City of Gadsden, the defendant below (“the City”), filed a permissive appeal pursuant to Rule 5, Ala. R.App. P., from a January 15, 2013, order of the Etowah Circuit Court denying the City’s motion for a summary judgment as to Roy Harbin’s breach-of-contract claim against the City. We reverse and remand.
Facts and Procedural History
Harbin started working as a police officer for the City in 1972. It is undisputed that he did not have a written employment contract with the City. In 1972, Harbin also started mandatory participation in the Policemen’s and Firemen’s Retirement…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Wilson v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Berner v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. HodurskiSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Joe Taylor v. City of GadsdenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Amsted Rail Company Inc v. Bessemer, Alabama, City ofDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2020
- Brasher v. Allstate Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2020
- Douglas P. Byrne v. Vera FiskSupreme Court of Alabama · 2023
- Evans v. City of TalladegaDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.