Legal Opinion

Evans v. City of Talladega

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided September 28, 2015No. Case No.: 1:13-cv-00705-MHHPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

MADELINE HUGHES HAIKALA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the City of Tal-ladega has asked the Court to enter judgment in its favor on the breach of contract and section 1983 claims that plaintiff Janet Evans has filed against the City. (Doc. 48). Ms. Evans’s claims relate to her effort's to launch a production of her.play NaRu at the Ritz Theatre, a historic landmark that the City owns. Initially, Ms. Evans contracted for her play to premiere at the theater in May 2012. Theater personnel rescheduled Ms. Evans’s…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. City of St. Louis v. PraprotnikSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Reginald Jones v. UPS Group FreightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API