Legal Opinion

Raubal v. Engelhard Minerals & Chemicals Corporation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 25, 1973No. 71 Civ. 5628PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BONSAL, District Judge.

This is a motion for summary judgment by the defendants in a private antitrust action brought by plaintiffs under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2) and Sections 73, 74, 75 and 76 of the Wilson Tariff Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 8-11), which extend the antitrust laws to the importation of goods. Plaintiffs seek treble damages and an injunction under Sections 4 and 16 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 15, 26). Jurisdiction is asserted under 28 U.S.C. § 1337. Plaintiffs also allege common law claims under the doctrine of pendent jurisdiction. Defendants’…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  3. Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Steele v. Bulova Watch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Crude Crew v. McGinnis & Associates, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1983
  2. P.H. Glatfelter Co. v. Voith, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API