Legal Opinion

Espinosa v. Beverly Hospital

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 1952No. Civ. 18978PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Appellant Isabel Espinosa entered respondent hospital under contract to receive obstetric care and services at the birth of her baby. On the third day thereafter respondents delivered to Isabel an infant purporting to be her own. Appellants took such child to their home and cared for it until their discovery that it was the offspring of others. On making known their grievance to respondents, the latter delivered to appellants another child which they' asserted was the progeny of appellants.

This action was instituted to recover $50,000 damages allegedly resulting from respondents’ negligence…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State Rubbish Collectors Ass'n v. SiliznoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Sloane v. Southern California Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Merrill v. Los Angeles Gas Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  4. May v. FarrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Emden v. VitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Molien v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Jarchow v. Transamerica Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Vance v. VanceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  4. Windeler v. Scheers JewelersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Petition of the United States of America as Owner of the United States Coast Guard Vessel Cg-95321, for Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability. United States of America, David J. Grant, AdministratorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API