Legal Opinion
Barnette v. Sayers
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 7, 1923No. 3860PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARBER, Acting Associate Justice.
The case comes here on a writ of error to the municipal court of the District. Barnette, the plaintiff in error, entered into a written contract with Sayers, the defendant, the material part of which we quote:
“$500.00. Washington, D. 0., Oct. 3, 1921.
“Received of Mrs. B. Barnette, the undersigned purchaser, a deposit of five hundred dollars to be applied as part payment on the purchase of Lot 24, Square 2826, in Washington, District of Columbia, with improvements thereon, known as premises numbered 1368 Quincy St. N. W., in the said District, which said…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sun Printing and Publishing Assn. v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- United States v. Bethlehem Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Willson v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
- Turner v. City of FremontCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Hedrick v. FirkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by23 opinions
- Vicki Bagley Realty, Inc. v. LauferDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Weatherford v. AdamsArizona Supreme Court · 1926
- Brecher v. LaikinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Davy v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
- Higgs v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.