Legal Opinion

Richmond Standard Steel, Spike & Iron Co. v. Dininny

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 14, 1905PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to'a judgment of tide Circuit Court of the city of Richmond, in a proceeding by foreign attachment. Judgment for the defendant. Plaintiff assigns errror.

1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.

This is a proceeding under section 1105 of the Code of 1887 against F. C. Dininny, Jr., president of the Chesterfield Coal Company, a foreign corporation, which had failed, as is claimed, to comply with section 1104 of that Code, which provides, among other things, that every foreign corporation doing business in this State shall have an office therein, in which all claims due residents of the State against such company may be audited, settled and paid; that such corporation shall, by a written power of attorney, appoint some person residing in this State its. agent, upon whom all lawful…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Immigration Society v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1904

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. C. I. T. Corp. v. GuySupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
  2. Karvalsky v. BeckerIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Miller and Rhoads v. WestDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1977
  4. Mountain Home Redi-Mix v. Conner Homes, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Root Jewelers, Inc. v. JDR Contracting, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API