Legal Opinion
Miller and Rhoads v. West
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided December 2, 1977No. Civ. A. 77-0420-RPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WARRINER, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendants’ motion of 3 October 1977 to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint in the above styled action. Defendants’ motion to dismiss is based upon: (1) lack of jurisdiction over the person of the defendants; (2) improper venue; (3) ineffective service of process; (4) unconstitutional service of process; and (5) the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The plaintiff has filed its responsive brief and the time within which the Local Rules allow the defendants to file their rebuttal brief has…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- John G. Kolbe, Inc. v. Chromodern Chair Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1971
- Carmichael v. SnyderSupreme Court of Virginia · 1968
- Ajax Realty Corporation v. J. F. Zook, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
- Continental Properties, Inc. v. Ullman Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1977
- Richmond Standard Steel, Spike & Iron Co. v. DininnySupreme Court of Virginia · 1905
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bass-Davis v. DavisNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Darden v. Heck's, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1978
- Holland v. HayDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1994
- Cordova v. AlperFairfax County Circuit Court · 2004
- Loria v. RegelsonRichmond County Circuit Court · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.