Legal Opinion

In re People v. Shank

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 11, 2018No. Supreme Court Case 17SA113PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUSTICE BOATRIGHT delivered the Opinion of the Court.

¶ 1 In this original proceeding, we consider whether the Office of the State Public Defender ("the P.D.") 1 is authorized to represent an indigent party in a civil forfeiture proceeding. The People argue that the P.D. does not have statutory authority to enter its appearance in civil forfeiture matters. The respondent, Alyse Elaine Shank, asserts that the statute that authorizes the P.D. to represent indigent defendants in criminal proceedings contains a general grant of authority for the P.D. to appear in any case where the P.D. deems such…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wimberly v. EttenbergSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  2. Ainscough v. OwensSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  3. Jefferson County Board of Equalization v. GerganoffSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
  4. Fognani v. YoungSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  5. People v. SteenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Diehl v. WeiserSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
  2. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
  3. v. DIA Brewing CoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
  4. 22SA31- Parental Responsibilities of: E.K. Orals not heldSupreme Court of Colorado · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API