Legal Opinion

Cardwell v. Ware

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 16, 1978No. 7721SC571PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

Plaintiff assigns as error the trial court’s refusal to allow one of plaintiff’s witnesses to testify regarding his out-of-court statement to a private investigator one month after the collision.

Upon vigorous cross-examination, and contrary to his testimony on direct examination, plaintiff’s witness Gary Myers expressed uncertainty as to whether he had actually seen plaintiff’s turn signal operating just prior to the time of the collision. In an effort to bolster Myers’ earlier testimony, plaintiff’s counsel sought on redirect to elicit the substance of an earlier statement by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burnett v. Wilmington, Newbern & Norfolk Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  2. State v. McLawhornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Clarke v. HolmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Gasperson v. RiceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Spruill v. SummerlinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API