Legal Opinion

Grange Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Golden Gas Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 16, 1956No. 17801PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutton

Plaintiffs in error, plaintiffs in the trial court and hereinafter called plaintiffs or by name, seek review by writ of error of the judgment entered by the district court setting aside the verdicts of a jury and the judgment entered thereon, and entering judgment non obstante veredicto for the defendant. Plaintiffs’ claims are for damages arising out of a fire caused by the alleged negligence of defendant in filling a farm home propane gas tank.

Plaintiff Grange Mutual Fire Insurance Company, under a contract of insurance, paid part of the fire loss which arose and claims rights by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Little Pittsburg Con. Min. Co. v. Little Chief Con. Min. Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1888
  3. Garden of the Gods Village, Inc. v. HellmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
  4. Burenheide v. WallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  5. Zimmerman v. FranzenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Blueflame Gas, Inc. v. Van HooseSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Kodekey Electronics, Inc. v. The Mechanex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
  3. Frankfort Oil Company v. AbramsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Salida Gas Service Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Public Service Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API