Legal Opinion
Shuster v. State
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 7, 1898PublishedCited by 7 opinions
On error to the Gloucester Sessions.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Collins, J.
Reversal is sought of a judgment of conviction upon the following indictment:
“ Gloucester county, to wit: The grand inquest of State of New Jersey and for the body of the county of Gloucester, upon their respective oath and affirmation, those affirming having first alleged themselves conscientiously scrupulous of taking an oath, present that Frederick A.-Shuster, junior, late of the city of Woodbury, in the said county of Gloucester, on the first' day of November, in the year of our Lord one *522thousand eight hundred and ninety-five, and at…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Parker v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
- Mead v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1891
- Rogers v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1895
- Mack v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. SpragueSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
- Campbell Baking Co. v. City of Harrisonville, Mo.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- State v. LustbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
- Town of Montclair v. ScolaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
- State v. KindSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.