Legal Opinion
Mead v. State
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 15, 1891PublishedCited by 15 opinions
'On error to the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
The Chancellor.
The plaintiff in error was convicted! in the Camden County Court of Quarter Sessions upon an indictment for forgery containing four counts, the first of which, charged him with having forged the endorsement “D. H. Erdman ” on the back of a promissory note of the following tenor, to wit:
“Camden, N. J., Feb. 5, 1890.
“ One month after date I promise to pay to the order of D;. H. Erdman, at Camden Safe Deposit & Trust Company, Camden, N. J., three hundred and fifty dollars. '
“ $350. ' W. T. Mead.”
with intent to injure and defraud Daniel H.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. SnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
3Cited by15 opinions
- Buessel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
- Gabriel v. Auf Der Heide-Aragona, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- State v. HugginsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
- State v. GoldmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
- Packard v. Bergen Neck Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1892
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.