Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 13, 1991No. C 89-308; CA A63253PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Defendant appeals his convictions for manufacturing a controlled substance and on two counts of possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. He contends that the trial court erred when it failed to make findings or conclusions in its denial of his motions to controvert and to suppress, denied his motion to suppress evidence found in the search of his residence, trailer and safe deposit box and convicted him, without sufficient evidence, of manufacturing methamphetamine. We affirm.

On August 17,1988, police executed search warrants for defendant’s residence, trailer and safe deposit box.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. VillagranOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. AnspachOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. SlowikowskiOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. WiseOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. DeneuiSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. WooSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  3. State v. MorenoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. State v. SlovikCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. State v. DeneuiSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API