Legal Opinion

State v. Moreno

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 12, 2005No. 02CR 0426; A119340PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a precursor substance with intent to manufacture, ORS 475.967, assigning error to the denial of his motion for a judgment of acquittal. On appeal, the only issue is whether stealing and possessing a large quantity of pseudoephedrine is sufficient to support a finding, beyond a reasonable doubt, that defendant intended to manufacture methamphetamine. We conclude that it is not, and we therefore reverse in part.

The pertinent facts are relatively few. Defendant stole five packages of Sudafed cold medicine, containing a total of approximately 15…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. State v. Lopez-MedinaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. J. N. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. State v. GuckertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. State v. McAteeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. State v. CookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. State v. CookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API