Legal Opinion

J. N. Kramer & Son v. Messner & Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 1, 1897PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Linn District Court. — Hon. William P. Wolf, Judge. Action at law to recover damages of defendants for failure to furnish a sufficient steam-heating apparatus for warming a greenhouse, owned by the plaintiffs, in the city of Cedar Rapids. Trial to a jury. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.

1 On the eleventh day of August, 1893, the parties to this litigation entered into a written contract, of which the following are the material parts: “We hereby propose to furnish for your greenhouse and office on 3rd avenue a first-class low pressure hot-water, heating apparatus, for the sum of $525.00 (five hundred and twenty-five dollars), according to the following specifications: System and quality of piping: Flow and return pipes properly graded and suspended in expansion hangers, with provision for expansion of all parts, will be of ample size to supply each radiator, and so…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Burg v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  2. Kearney Milling & Elevator Co. v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  3. Mann v. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
  4. Starr Bros. v. StevensonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  5. Leonard v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1892

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Curtis & Gartside Co. v. PribylSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Wilson v. Avery Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. Nitrin, Inc. v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  4. Snyder v. SargeantSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  5. Lewis v. DavisUtah Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API