Curtis & Gartside Co. v. Pribyl
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from Superior Court, Oklahoma County; A. N. Munden, Judge. Action by James Pribyl against the Cnrtis & Gartside Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
This proceeding in error is to review a judgment for $5,000 in favor of the plaintiff in a case wherein the defendant in error, as plaintiff, sued the plaintiff in error, as defendant, for damages on account of personal injuries alleged to have been sustained on October 18, 1908, while employed in a manufacturing establishment owned and operated by said defendant. The plaintiff in error will be herein referred to as “the company” and the defendant in error as “the employee.” The action was commenced in the lower court on September 25, 1909. In the petition the employee-charges: (1) Failure of…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- United States v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1881
- Narramore v. Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
- Knisley v. . PrattNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Johnston v. . FargoNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. DuranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Alva Roller Mills v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Jones v. Oklahoma Planing Mill & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Gypsy Oil Co. v. GinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Continental Casualty Co. v. ShankelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.