Legal Opinion
Trammell v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.
District Court, E.D. South Carolina
Decided May 22, 1942No. Civ. A. No. 543PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WARING, District Judge.
Two motions were filed in the above-entitled cause: the first for an order transferring and removing the cause from the Florence Division to the Charleston Division; and the second a motion to dismiss the complaint because it fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted against the defendant. By an order dated May 28, 1941, the Honorable Alva M. Lumpkin, then presiding judge, extended the time for answering or otherwise pleading until the motions could be heard and passed upon. Both of these motions were presented and argued before me at the term of court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Piland v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- Rutledge v. SmallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- Carter v. HornbackSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- People ex rel. Conway v. BarkerNew York Supreme Court · 1895
- In re TilyouAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Allen v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1981
- Patton v. PattonIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
- Smeed v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Smeed v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Middleton v. PearmanDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.