Legal Opinion
Smeed v. Carpenter
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 12, 1960No. 16441PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Circuit Judge.
This action is concerned with transactions arising out of the buying and selling of livestock. The livestock business reached such a magnitude that Congress, sensing its vital concern to the country, saw fit to enact regulatory legislation known as the Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921, 7 U.S.C.A. § 181, and placed in the hands of the Secretary of Agriculture the duty of carrying out the mandates of said act. “The object to be secured by the act is the free and unburdened flow of livestock from the ranges and farms of the West and the Southwest through the great stockyards…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stafford v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc. v. ShondellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
- Kenney v. FoxDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1955
- Meisenheimer v. KelloggWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Munson Line, Inc. v. GreenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Julia Prewitt Brown v. Trustees of Boston UniversityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Baugh v. Matheson (In Re Matheson)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Alabama · 1981
- 20 Fair empl.prac.cas. 49, 20 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 30,033 Jack R. Simpson v. Alaska State Commission for Human Rights, Intervenor v. Providence Washington Insurance Group, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Oliver v. FosterDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1981
- Smeed v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.