Legal Opinion

Department of Labor & Industries v. Cascadian Building Maintenance, Ltd.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 2, 2015No. 71209-8-IPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 — Cascadian Building Maintenance Ltd. appeals a trial court decision denying Cascadian stay-at-work wage reimbursement for the first 3 of the 6 days its employee worked light duty following her industrial injury. Because RCW 51.32.090(4) incentivizes employers to allow workers to “remain at work following their injury,” we reject the trial court’s conclusion that RCW 51.32.090(7)’s 3-day waiting period for time loss payments to workers for temporary disabilities lasting 14 days or less applies to wage subsidy payments made to an employer under RCW 51.32-.090(4). Because RCW 51.52.130…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. JacobsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Dennis v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Cerrillo v. EsparzaWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Cerrillo v. EsparzaWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Rogers v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Department Of Labor & Industries v. Rito BrisenoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  2. In Re The Estate Of Curtis E. Carlson David Wands, D.d.s., Res. v. Dona Seely, D.d.s., App.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  3. Miguel I. Sandoval Arambula v. Dep't of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API