Archuleta v. Turley
District Court, D. Utah
1Opinion of the Court
TENA CAMPBELL, District Judge.
On June 1, 2012, Petitioner Michael Anthony Archuleta filed what was incorrectly styled as an Objection to Appearance of Mark Field as Counsel for Respondent and a Memorandum in Support of Petitioner’s Objection to Appearance of Mark Field as Counsel for Respondent.1 {See Dkt. No. 41 and 42.) After the court granted an extension of time to submit his response, Respondent Steven Turley2 filed his Response on July 3, 2012. {See Dkt. No. 47.) Mr. Archuleta submitted his Reply on July 17, 2012. {See Dkt. No. 49.)
Mr. Archuleta argues that because Mr. Field handled his…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Servants of the Paraclete v. DoesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller Ex Rel. KollerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Erickson v. Newmar Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Paul W. Kessenich v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Rosenthal & Company v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Paul W. Kessenich, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Parkinson v. Phonex Corp.District Court, D. Utah · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Infinium Builders LLC v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2023
- The Trial Lawyers College v. Gerry Spences Trial Lawyers College at Thunderhead RanchDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 2022