Legal Opinion

Wilson Floors Co. v. Sciota Park, Ltd.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1978No. 77-976PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

The central issue in this cause is whether the bank’s oral promise to Wilson that payments would be-forthcoming upon a resumption of work at The Cliffs project constituted an enforceable oral contract.

R. C. 1335.05 provides:

“No action shall be brought whereby to charge the defendant, upon a special promise, to answer for the debt, default, or miscarriage of another person * * * unless the agreement upon which such action is brought, or some memorandum or note thereof, is in writing and signed by the. party to be charged therewith or some other person thereunto by him or her lawfully…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davis v. PatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Calkins v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Wolf v. FriedmanOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Kampman v. Pittsburgh Contracting & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Grant v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Berry v. LupicaOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Graybar Electric Co. v. SawyerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  3. Widok v. Estate of WolfOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Corzin v. Rawson (In Re Rawson)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1984
  5. Everstaff, L.L.C. v. Sansai Environmental Technologies, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API