Legal Opinion

State v. Manivong

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 2, 1999No. 96-09-47154; CA A99652PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

In this prosecution for unlawful possession of a firearm, the state appeals a pretrial order suppressing evidence that was obtained in violation of ORS 810.410.1 We conclude that the trial court erred and, accordingly, reverse and remand.

Before trial, defendant filed a motion to suppress the evidence, contending that it was obtained in violation of ORS 810.410, Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution, and the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The court ruled that the officer’s inquiry exceeded the permissible scope of the stop, rendering the evidence inadmissible…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. HitzOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Armatta v. KitzhaberOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. Dominguez-MartinezOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. FugateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. State v. FugateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. ManivongOregon Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API