Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Farrell

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1982No. CA 19784, SC 28483PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*824MEMORANDUM OPINION.

Petitioner seeks review of a Court of Appeals decision affirming an order terminating her parental rights to her two daughters. The trial court found the requisite facts by a preponderance of the evidence as specified in ORS 419.525(2). Petitioner contends that the statutory standard is inadequate to meet the requirements of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.

Since the Court of Appeals decision, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Santosky v. Kramer, 455 US 745, 102 S Ct 1388, 71 L Ed 2d 599…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. HabasOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Matter of FarrellOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. State ex rel. State Office for Services to Children & Families v. MendezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API