Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Rodriguez

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 11, 1982No. 1232 & 1238 CA A21863Published

1Per curiam

Appellant petitions for reconsideration of our decision affirming the termination of his parental rights. State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Rodriguez, 56 Or App 592, 643 P2d 424 (1982). He contends the state did not prove the allegations by clear and convincing evidence as required by Santosky v. Kramer, 455 US 745, 102 S Ct 1388, 71 L Ed 2d 599 (1982). The petition for reconsideration is granted. We have reexamined the record in light of State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Farrell, 55 Or App 897, 640 P2d 652, rem’d 292 Or 822, modified 58 Or App 258, 648 P2d 401 (1982), and adhere to our prior decision.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. FarrellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. FarrellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. FarrellOregon Supreme Court · 1982