Legal Opinion
United States v. Clarence D. Brigman
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 18, 2003No. 03-1655PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
CHERTOFF, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal from his conviction for distribution and possession with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(C), Appellant Clarence D. Brigman alleges that the Government failed to prove the cocaine in his possession was “crack” for purposes of Section 2D1.1 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.” or “Guidelines”). We determine that there was sufficient evidence for the District Court to find that Brigman possessed “crack,” and we will affirm his sentence.
I
On August 12, 1999, Brigman and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Michael DentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Luis Humberto BarbosaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Keith JamesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Henry BookerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Samuel Roman, A.K.A. Samuel Mercado Samuel Roman, United States of America v. Oscar Roman, A.K.A. Oscar MercadoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Quan ChauCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. FordDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- United States v. WarnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Commonwealth v. CornielMassachusetts Superior Court · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.