Legal Opinion
United States v. Ford
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 24, 2009No. Crim. 06-643PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POLLAK, District Judge.
Before the court is defendant Harold Ford’s motion to set aside the verdict on count one of the government’s two-count indictment. A jury found Ford guilty of distributing five or more grams of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(b), on November 10, 2005 (Count 1 of the indictment), but acquitted him of count two, distributing five or more grams of cocaine base in a separate incident on November 17, 2005 (Count 2). Ford moves for a judgment of acquittal on count one, pursuant to Rule 29(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Tyrone Werts v. Donald T. Vaughn the District Attorney of the County of Philadelphia the Attorney General of the State of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- UNITED STATES of America v. Darus H. ZEHRBACH, Appellant in No. 93-7477. Alex A. Mervis, Appellant in No. 93-7493Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fleck v. Trustees of the University of PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Paul Callahan v. Kevin Ransom, et al.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2026