Legal Opinion

Davis v. A. Booth & Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 2, 1904No. 1,310PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan.

1Opinion of the Court

SEVERENS, Circuit Judge.

The object of this bill filed in the Circuit Court by the appellee, A. Booth & Co., was to obtain an injunction against the appellants to restrain them from violating an agreement made by them with William Vernon Booth, to the benefits of which the appellee claimed to be entitled. It states: That the complainant is a corporation organized under the laws of Illinois on August 1, 1898, with a capital of $5,500,000, for the purpose of buying, catching, and selling fish, and having its general office at Chicago. That the Davis Fresh & Salt Fish Company was a corporation…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. United States v. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
  3. United States v. E. C. Knight Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Beasley v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Norcross v. JamesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State of California Ex Rel. Van De Kamp v. TexacoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Mannington v. Hocking Valley Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1910
  3. United Shoe Machinery Co. v. La ChapelleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  4. Buckhout v. WitwerMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Wark v. Ervin Press CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API