Legal Opinion
State v. Owen
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided March 22, 1945PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bubling, C. 0. J. and S. C. 0.
Motion has been made before me to strike out the answer filed by the defendant in the above entitled cause for the following reasons: (1) The answer is sham and frivolous and filed for the purpose of delay, and (2) the answer does not contain a legal defense to said complaint, and for summary judgment.
Summons was issued and the complaint was filed in this matter by the State of New Jersey, and it thereby seeks to recover a judgment against the defendant for the amount of unpaid rent under the terms of a riparian lease. The complaint is terse and as follows:
"1.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Federal Housing Administration, Region No. 4 v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Strobel Steel Construction Co. v. State Highway Commission of New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
- National Surety Co. v. MulliganSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1929
- Milberg v. KeutheSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
- Penrose v. Absecon Land Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Devins v. Borough of BogotaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
- Bergen Commun. College Trustees v. JP FYFENew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Town of GrantsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Dickinson v. FUND FOR SUPPORT OF FREE PUB. SCH.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- State v. Estate of CrockerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.