Legal Opinion

National Surety Co. v. Mulligan

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 20, 1929PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Walker, Chancellor.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court entered upon striking out defendant’s answer. The plaintiff moved to strike it out "on the ground that said answer is false, sham and frivolous and interposed solely for the purpose of delay.”

A plea cannot be both sham and frivolous. It is either sham or frivolous. A sham plea is one good on its face but false in fact; a frivolous plea is one which on its face sets up no defense, although it may be true in fact. In re Beam, 93 N. J. Eq. 593; Fidelity, &c., Co. v. Wilkes-Barre,…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of NeuwirthNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  2. Lewis v. United Order of Good SamaritansSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  3. State v. OwenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1945
  4. Second National Bank of Phila. v. ThompsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
  5. Laughlin v. FrancSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API