Legal Opinion

Devins v. Borough of Bogota

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 10, 1991PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

POLLOCK, J.

The primary issue on this appeal is whether adverse possession should apply to municipally-owned property not dedicated to or used for a public purpose. Ruling that adverse possession should not so apply, the Appellate Division affirmed the Chan- eery Division’s grant of summary judgment for the municipality, Borough of Bogota (“the Borough” or “Bogota”). 237 N.J.Super. 596, 568 A.2d 903 (1989). We granted the petition for certification of plaintiffs-appellants, James J. Devins and Mary J. Devins, his wife, 121 N.J. 603, 583 A.2d 307 (1990),…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of WestfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  2. Pierce v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  3. O'KEEFFE v. SnyderSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  4. Willis v. Department of Conservation & Economic DevelopmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  5. P, T & L Construction Co. v. Commissioner, Department of TransportationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Holloway v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  2. New Jersey Transit Corp. v. Borough of SomervilleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  3. Davison v. Duke UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. Kibble v. Weeks Dredging & Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  5. New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority v. Gruzen PartnershipSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API