Legal Opinion

Raymond v. Leavitt

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1881PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error to Wayne. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Leavitt sued plaintiffs in error on the common counts and served a bill of particulars in which the demands were set out under different forms and itemá as *449$10,000 money lent, $10,000 handed defendants for their nse on their guaranty that it should be repaid in a reasonable time, $10,000 deposited with them for their accommodation, and $2327.53 on account stated. He recovered $3027.53, which is claimed on the argument to have been made up by the sum of what is called an account stated, and an error of $700.

The plaintiff’s story on oath w^s that the'sum of $10,000 was advanced by him in May,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Arnot v. . Pittston and Elmira Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. People v. FisherNew York Supreme Court · 1835

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. WeithoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Connors v. ConnollySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
  3. Samuels v. OliverIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  4. People v. North River Sugar Refining Co.New York Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Lovejoy v. MichelsMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API