Legal Opinion

United States v. Saikaly

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 5, 2003No. 01-4001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Mansour Saikaly appeals the 240-month sentence of incarceration imposed for his conviction on one count of conspiracy to traffic in cocaine, arguing that the sentence violates the rule announced in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Because we find Saikaly’s sentence comports with the rule of Apprendi as explained in Harris v. United States, 536 U.S. 545, 122 S.Ct. 2406, 153 L.Ed.2d 524 (2002), we will affirm the sentence.

BACKGROUND

This is the third incarnation of Mr. Saikaly’s appeal to this court. Our opinion…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. United States v. Leonard Lloyd (92-2106) Shawn Huffman (92-2108) Darryl Little (92-2146) and Mario Taylor (92-2175)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Darwin Jay Copeland Anthony Antoine HartwellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Mansour SaikalyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. Randell RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  3. United States v. SaikalyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API