Legal Opinion

Kreager v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 1992No. Docket 133800PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, P.J.

In this action for no-fault personal injury protection (pip) benefits, plaintiff appeals as of right from the trial court’s grant of summary disposition to defendant pursuant to MCR 2.116(0(10). The trial court did not rule on defendant’s declaratory judgment action (which was consolidated with plaintiffs suit) to determine if plaintiff is entitled to uninsured motorist benefits. We affirm as to the pip claim and remand with instructions that declaratory judgment be granted to defendant on the uninsured motorist claim.

Plaintiff had stopped his car at an intersection when he felt something hit…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Thornton v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Miller v. Auto-Owners Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Panich v. Iron Wood Products Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Curtis v. BirchAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  5. Saunders v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Berry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Rohlman v. Hawkeye-Security InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Morosini v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Rice v. Isi Manufacturing, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Wills v. State Farm InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API