Legal Opinion

Milwaukee Electric Railway & Transport Co v. Public Service Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1952PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGehl, J.

In support of its order the commission found that as to each of the proposed extensions public convenience and necessity require them, and that the construction and operation of each would not impair the company’s earnings so as to prevent an adequate or fair return. These findings and the orders were made pursuant to and under the provisions of sec. 193.10, Stats., which reads:

“Any street-railway corporation operating within any municipality shall extend its lines and furnish service thereon whenever, after complaint made and public hearing after notice to all parties, interested, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. New York Ex Rel. New York & Queens Gas Co. v. McCallSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. New York Ex Rel. Woodhaven Gas Light Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Ray-O-Vac Co. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946
  4. State ex rel. City of Milwaukee v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tetra Tech EC, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Village of Cobb v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Tetra Tech EC, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API