Village of Cobb v. Public Service Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDietereich, J.
The first issue raised by appellants is that the commission failed to comply with the notice requirements *447of sec. 192.56, Stats. In support thereof the following reasons are stated: (1) The application must be considered on the basis of the individual communities affected and not, as in the instant case, on a single application involving numerous communities; (2) every continued or adjourned hearing before the commission must be treated as a new case and the posting of a statutory notice in “five conspicuous places” should again be carried out; (3) the commission failed to post statutory…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Borgnis v. Falk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- State Ex Rel. Ball v. McPheeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Perkins v. PeacockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Petition of HeffernanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Wisconsin's Environmental Decade, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- R. T. Madden, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. Outagamie County Board of AdjustmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- Wisconsin Collectors Asso. v. Thorp Finance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Stacy v. Ashland County Department of Public WelfareWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.