Legal Opinion
Sacramento City Unified School District, Board of Education v. Rachel H. ex rel. Holland
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 24, 1994No. 92-15608PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SNEED, Circuit Judge:
The Sacramento Unified School District (“the District”) timely appeals the district court’s judgment in favor of Rachel Holland (“Rachel”) and the California State Department of Education. The court found that the appropriate placement for Rachel under the Individuals with Disabilities Act (“IDEA”) was full-time in a regular second grade classroom with some supplemental services. The District contends that the appropriate placement for Rachel is half-time in special edu*1400cation classes and half-time in a regular class. We affirm the judgment of the district court.
I
FACTS AND…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Roland M. And Miriam M. v. The Concord School CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Alexander Kerkam v. Floretta McKenzie Superintendent, D.C. Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Gregory K., a Student of the Longview School District v. Longview School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Lillbask ex rel. Mauclaire v. Connecticut Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- J.W. ex rel. J.E.W. v. Fresno Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- I.L. ex rel. Taylor v. Knox County Board of EducationDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2017
- Carlos Baquerizo v. Garden Grove Unified Sch DistCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- C.D. by and Through M.D. v. Natick Public School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.