Legal Opinion

Ogilvie v. STATE BD. OF EQUALIZATION, ETC.

District Court, D. North Dakota

Decided July 2, 1980No. Civ. A3-79-183PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

BENSON, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs in the above entitled action contend defendants have violated § 306 of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 (the 4-R Act) by discriminatory property tax treatment of plaintiffs’ rail transportation property. Plaintiffs seek declaratory relief. An order enjoining defendants, their successors, their agents or employees and those in active concert or participation with them, including the County Treasurers of the fifty-three counties of the State of North Dakota, from collecting the disputed portions of property tax payments due from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. BrowningSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Soo Line Railroad v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. EagertonDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1979

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Ogilvie v. State Board of EqualizationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. BairSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  3. Trailer Train Company Railbox Company and Railgon Company v. Donald S. Leuenberger, Tax Commissioner of the State of NebraskaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
  4. Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company v. EagertonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. LennenDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1982

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API