Legal Opinion

Ogilvie v. State Board of Equalization

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 20, 1981No. Nos. 80-1679, 80-1738PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN PELT, Senior District Judge.

This action was brought by three railroads, to-wit, the Milwaukee (by a trustee), the Soo Line, and the BN, the full names of which are above set forth, as plaintiffs, against The State Board of Equalization of the State of North Dakota, and others above named. A provision of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976, hereinafter called the 4-R Act, vests United States District Courts with jurisdiction to prevent, restrain or terminate acts by a state and others which are prohibited under the 4-R Act. It is claimed that section 306 of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. General American Tank Car Corp. v. El Dorado Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Ogilvie v. STATE BD. OF EQUALIZATION, ETC.District Court, D. North Dakota · 1980
  3. Greenville Steel Car Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Burlington Northern Railroad Company v. City of Superior, WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  2. Clinchfield Railroad Company v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  3. The Kansas City Southern Railway Co., Cross v. Shirley McNamara Secretary of the Dept. Of Revenue and Taxation, State of Louisiana, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. BairSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  5. Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company v. EagertonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API