Sopala v. Menard, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION LUCYNA E. SOPALA, Plaintiff, Case No. 19-cv-830 v. Judge Mary M. Rowland MENARD, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff brings this negligence action against Menard for injuries she suffered after tripping and falling at a Menard retail hardware store in Melrose Park, Illinois. For the reasons stated below, Menard’s motion for summary judgment [32] is granted. SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD Summary judgment is proper where “the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Skiba v. Ill. Cent. R.R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- White v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Kreg Therapeutics, Inc. v. Vitalgo, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.