Legal Opinion

Sopala v. Menard, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 13, 2020No. 1:19-cv-00830Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION LUCYNA E. SOPALA, Plaintiff, Case No. 19-cv-830 v. Judge Mary M. Rowland MENARD, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff brings this negligence action against Menard for injuries she suffered after tripping and falling at a Menard retail hardware store in Melrose Park, Illinois. For the reasons stated below, Menard’s motion for summary judgment [32] is granted. SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD Summary judgment is proper where “the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Skiba v. Ill. Cent. R.R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  4. White v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  5. Kreg Therapeutics, Inc. v. Vitalgo, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API