Legal Opinion
A & M RECORDS, INC. v. State Bd. of Equalization
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 1, 1988No. B024836PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.—
Appellants, A&M Records, Inc. (A&M), A&M Pacific, Inc. (Pacific) and Lou Adler (Adler), who are plaintiffs in two consolidated cases (collectively plaintiffs), 1 appeal from a summary judgment granted in favor of defendant, the State Board of Equalization of the State of California (the Board), and from an order which granted the Board’s motion in limine. 2 'In both of the cases, the respective plaintiffs sought a refund, plus interest, of certain sales and use taxes 3 which they had paid to the Board. The trial court determined that plaintiffs are not entitled to any…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
- Richfield Oil Corp. v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Culligan Water Conditioning of Bellflower, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Parr-Richmond Industrial Corp. v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Preston v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Neecke v. City of Mill ValleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Filmservice Laboratories, Inc. v. Harvey Bernhard Enterprises Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Navistar International Transportation Corp. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.