Navistar International Transportation Corp. v. State Board of Equalization
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KENNARD, J.
—California imposes a sales tax on the retail sale of tangible personal property (Rev. & Tax. Code, § 6051),1 but excludes from taxation the transfer of intangible property and the transfer of a “custom computer program” (§ 6010.9). The issues here are:
1. When a company’s trade secrets or other intellectual work product are embodied in documents, is the sale of those documents a transfer of tangible personal property and thus taxable, or does the intellectual content of the documents render the sale a nontaxable transfer of intangible property?
2. When a company develops a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Higgins v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Culligan Water Conditioning of Bellflower, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Roth Drug, Inc. v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Wallace Berrie & Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Simplicity Pattern Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Preston v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Ananda Church of Self-Realization v. Massachusetts Bay InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- State Ex Rel. Clayburgh v. American West Community Promotions, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- MODERN PAINT & BODY SUPPLY, INC. v. State Bd. of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.