Legal Opinion

Navistar International Transportation Corp. v. State Board of Equalization

California Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1994No. S032195PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KENNARD, J.

—California imposes a sales tax on the retail sale of tangible personal property (Rev. & Tax. Code, § 6051),1 but excludes from taxation the transfer of intangible property and the transfer of a “custom computer program” (§ 6010.9). The issues here are:

1. When a company’s trade secrets or other intellectual work product are embodied in documents, is the sale of those documents a transfer of tangible personal property and thus taxable, or does the intellectual content of the documents render the sale a nontaxable transfer of intangible property?

2. When a company develops a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Higgins v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Culligan Water Conditioning of Bellflower, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Roth Drug, Inc. v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Wallace Berrie & Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Simplicity Pattern Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Preston v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Ananda Church of Self-Realization v. Massachusetts Bay InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. State Ex Rel. Clayburgh v. American West Community Promotions, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. MODERN PAINT & BODY SUPPLY, INC. v. State Bd. of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API