Legal Opinion

Van Horne v. Muller

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1998No. 85063PublishedCited by 148 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bilandic

Plaintiff, Keith Van Horne, brought this action in the circuit court of Cook County to recover damages for injury to his reputation resulting from allegedly defamatory statements made by radio deejay Matthew “Man-cow” Muller (Muller) and his cobroadcaster Irma Blanco (Blanco). Plaintiff asserted claims for defamation per se against Muller and Blanco as well as WRCX Radio (WRCX), the radio station employing Muller and Blanco, and Evergreen Media Corporation (Evergreen), the owner of the radio station. The complaint also asserted claims against WRCX and Evergreen for negligent and reckless…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Bryson v. News America Publications, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
  3. McGrath v. FaheyIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Kolegas v. Heftel Broadcasting Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Chapski v. Copley PressIllinois Supreme Court · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by148 opinions

  1. Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Grace Ptasznik v. St. Joseph Hospital and Resurrection Health CareCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  3. Green v. RogersIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Vancura v. KatrisIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Kiesau v. BantzSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004

143 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API